Popular Photography Imaging

Good magazine (2010-02-28) : 3/5
This is a good magazine. They have redone the inside since the last time I read it. The format is much better now.
NEW FORMAT IS EVEN LESS (2009-12-14) : 1/5
Popular Photography has recently introduced a "new format." I have always thought this magazine had the least content of all photo mags. But now the new format has succeeded in delivering even LESS. Before you get into many articles you are already in the advertising section--and you'll ask yourself, "that's it?" If you have money to burn subscribe. Otherwise there are choices that will give you far more content for the money. Obviously the editor believes bigger print and large illustrations can save her some money. If I were you I'd save your money and NOT subscribe!
Get a 1 Year subscription, should be enough (2009-10-05) : 3/5
The magazine is targeted to the beginner/prosumer in my opinion. It's good and light reading. Full of ads though. I agree with the other reviewer that it gets repetitive after a while, especially if you photography skills are a big advanced.
Great photography magazine (2009-09-14) : 5/5
I have been reading and using this magazine for about 45 years. Its great and upto speed.
DO NOT ORDER THROUGH AMAZON (2009-09-09) : 1/5
Popular Photography is a great magazine. I've bought issues through my local bookstore for years. Then I saw the great prices offered here through Amazon. Unfortunately, my credit card was charged the price the price shown, but since then I have received several bills for the $6 difference from what was shown and Pop Photos regular price. They are now threatening to send me to collections. Another magazine I ordered was never recieved.br /br /Amazon told me to contact the publishers. Pop Photo could care less, they just want their $6 and the second magazine did not have a working number. br /br /This was a HORRIBLE situation and I would suggest just getting the card out of the magazine at the store and mailing it in.